![]() |
Deirdre Nansen McCloskey | |
| Distinguished Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication
University of Illinois at Chicago Professor of Economic History, Gothenburg University, Sweden |
Deirdre McCloskey is an economist, historian, and rhetorician who has written sixteen books and around 400 scholarly pieces on topics ranging from technical economics and statistics to transgender advocacy and ethics. She is known as a "conservative" economist, University-of-Chicago style (she taught for 12 years there), but protests that "I'm a literary, quantitative, postmodern, free-market, progressive Episcopalian, Midwestern woman from Boston who was once a man. Not 'conservative'! I'm a Christian libertarian." Her latest book, Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World, argues that an ideological change, rather than saving or exploitation, is what made us rich... more » |
|
A chapter-by-chapter outline of Deirdre McCloskey's in-progress book The Treasured Bourgeoisie: How Markets and Innovation Became Virtuous, 1600-1848, and Then Suspect, a third volume in her series on The Bourgeois Era.
An e-book version of Deirdre McCloskey's Crossing: A Memoir is free to download this month from its publisher, the University of Chicago Press.
"We have weaker ties—weaker connections with each other—but we have more of them… We still have community in the modern world."
Also: McCloskey is interviewed, both singly and with Arjo Klamer, by Dutch journalist Frank Mulder.
"Boldizzoni's attack on cliometrics is unpersuasive, in part because he does not grasp economics and its uses, in part because he admires uncritically the German Historical School and their modern descendants, the French Annalistes..."
"A Neo-Institutionalism of Measurement, Without Measurement: A Comment on Douglas Allen’s The Institutional Revolution" is Deirdre McCloskey's contribution to a symposium that will appear in a future issue of the Review of Austrian Economics.
“Allen does yeoman work in explaining some of the peculiarities of British public administration, such as the reliance on aristocratic honor and on the prize system in naval warfare. But he attributes to public administration an implausible effect on private incomes. The merging of power and plenty is mistaken.”
A five-chapter excerpt from McCloskey's book Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World that contends particularly with the work of economist Douglass North.

McCloskey's full review of Michael J. Sandel's What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets is here on DeirdreMcCloskey.org; a shorter version appears in the Claremont Review of Books.
Stephen Ziliak and Deirdre McCloskey have the last word in an Econ Journal Watch exchange with Thomas Mayer over Ziliak and McCloskey's The Cult of Statistical Significance.
McCloskey is profiled in the American Association for the Advancement of Science's "Member Spotlight."
“Science is ethical all the way down... How we know things is a deeply ethical procedure.”